lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1997]   [Aug]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: buffer cache patches - anybody willing to summarize?
On Mon, 4 Aug 1997, Jeff Wiegley wrote:

> I almost don't think driver updates are even appropriate at all for the
> 2.0 tree. Security and fatal bug fixes *only*. other than that 2.0
> supports what it supports and you should wait for 2.2/3.0 to include new
> hardware support.

Most problems with the 2.0-series of kernels are not from new drivers, but
rather from other, deeper fixes. They were unfortunate, but I assume they
were necessary to change. Most driver changes were actually just updates
to make them work better.

If the even-numbered kernels are not to be updated with new drivers I
think they would have to be more frequent.

Peter



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:40    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans