[lkml]   [1997]   [Aug]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: FAT12 vs FAT16

> Not if it's a disk supported by MS-DOS or created using MS-DOS tools.
> MS-DOS format will not (read cannot) make such a disk. Even with its
> media type/size/heads options, it doesn't have the code necessary to
> produce a disk under any other rules because it calculates the
> clusters not you, and it uses the 4085 cluster rule for writing the FAT.
> Just because, in principle I can make a disk with one cluster and a 16-bit
> FAT, does not mean that it is a MS-DOS disk. MS-DOS will not understand
> such a disk so no other OS should bother with such a deviation either.

Unfortunately, the rules are not the same for different DOS versions :-(

Have a nice fortnight
Martin `MJ' Mares <>
Faculty of Math and Physics, Charles University, Prague, Czech Rep., Earth
"A LISP programmer knows value of everything, but cost of nothing."

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:40    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital Ocean