[lkml]   [1997]   [Aug]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: bind sucks?

"David S. Miller" writes:
>In any event, I've put the humungo patch I sent to Linus, which he
>didn't like, at:


Indeed, comparing them, I see that the tcp_good_socknum() changes
did not make it into Linus's tree. Nor did a few other changes
in tcp.c. I'm not qualified to evaluate them... (I'm ignoring
the SO_BINDTODEVICE on the assumption that Linus didn't want to
add a new feature.)

Other missing changes that I noticed that will effect our support
department here at Red Hat are:
o Changes to pci.h and pci.c that include new 53c8xx controllers
and ET6000
o The new 53c8xx driver from Gerard; we have quite a few customers
who depend on the new 52c8xx driver.
o The new advansys driver

Also, the fs/dquot.c fix is missing, and some ncpfs fixes are missing.


"Magazines all too frequently lead to books and should be regarded by the
prudent as the heavy petting of literature." -- Fran Lebowitz

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:40    [W:0.078 / U:7.340 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site