Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 8 Jul 1997 20:09:45 +0200 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: 2.1.44 |
| |
Hi!
> 2.1.44pre3 wasnt bad - in fact its been the best for a while. 2.1.44 is > a bit of a disaster. It doesnt boot, and on the odd combination of settings > that do boot it scrambles your disk.
Hmm, looks like I was the fortunate one who looked at the list before actually patching that ;-).
> The responsible thing to do would surely to be to rename it 2.1.44pre4 before > it does further needless damage. I've no problem with 2.1.x having odd suprises > like sometimes eating bits of disks - it is test code, but now we know its > extremely dangerous moving it from the normal place would be smart.
Bad idea... Having two patches with same number is bad. What about launching 2.1.45 patching the most fatal things _fast_? Most people download latest patch...
-- -- I'm really pavel@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz. Pavel Look at http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/ ;-).
| |