Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 30 Jul 1997 21:49:06 -0700 (PDT) | From | Travis Cole <> | Subject | Re: PentiumII's. |
| |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 30-Jul-97 Lai Zit Seng wrote: >On Wed, 30 Jul 1997, Bruce Thompson wrote: > >> We have a 266MHz PII running with the latest red hat release (4.2). >> Linux gives it 265 BogoMIPS and I've benchmarked it with our code (integer >> CPU intensive) at being about 35% faster than a PP200 256k. >> >> I don't think any current chip sets allow more than two PII chips yet in >> addition to the problems already mentioned bellow. > >I was hoping someone might have a direct comparison between PPro and PII >at the same clock speed. Anyone? > > >..lzs >
Take a look at http://www.x86.org
There are some bench marks of the K6, PII and Ppro, all at the same clock speed.
- ------------------------- E-Mail: Travis Cole <tcole@iname.com> -- <tcole@methow.com> http://www.methow.com/~tcole -- Get my Public Key here Date: 30-Jul-97 Time: 21:49:09 640Kb should be enough for anybody Bill Gates - ------------------------- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3a Charset: noconv
iQCVAwUBM+AZgWgYC2+RaorhAQHAxQQAjL3rOIb1kr20K9N/AlEUx/YOIFc1b101 IroHfWNfxQsun2mxb5WnWij2YgwVOozWfQPq656NEFX7wqStQIvsq7E07aVuA/6u tjPz0/FZd5bCSwgzZwQuzvCyIr92D5JDVfZ3ajaOWYuJjPlsIXOkRg1FcxyjWKvS t+rlLRcsXs8= =AYmF -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| |