Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 23 Jul 1997 13:25:24 -0400 | From | James Mastros <> | Subject | Re: I2O, free software |
| |
At 12:09 PM 7/23/97 +0200, joost witteveen wrote: > >I just looked at the I2O pages, but I cannot find how they actually >define a "member". So what if we set up an organisation that simply >includes the whole world (or everybody who wants to join us), and >let that organisation be a member? Then not being able to >disclose the source-code to non-members isn't gonna be too much >of a problem. > >But I'm sure somewhere in the fine print they define what the structure >or whatever of each individual memeber is, and anyway, MS apparently >can expell any member they want. Would be interesting though, MS >publicly expelling the free software world from I2O. >
I like the way you think... the only problem is that, even though we can define all sentient beings (human, artificial, and other) to be members of our org, we still have to come up with the money... Unfortunately, it looks like this passage would rule out a good portion of the human race:
# 3.1 Membership. I2O SIG membership shall be open to any person or entity # (whether a corporation, partnership, sole proprietorship, firm or # organization) whose interest or objective involves the design, # development or application of hardware or software products which will # incorporate or be based on the I2O Specification. Membership in the I2O # SIG is a matter of public record; however, membership lists will not be # sold or otherwise used for commercial purposes.
Not all humans in the known world have an interest or objective involving the design development, etc... Although it could be argued that anyone who runs Linux does. Wait, it is implicit that it does. Anyone who wishes to run Linux has an objective involving the application of sw which will be based on the I2) Specification (will be as soon as we find a good way around this NDA junk.
(Unfortunately, there doesn't seem to be anything against being in more than one group; we can't define everyone who would be part of the I2O to be part of our group, thereby reducing the i2o sig to one vote; so whatever our group decided would be automatic approved)
Interestingly, the i2o initiative agreement uses the term "in good standing" many times, but I can find no definition of it. Does this mean that the steering committee could just define all of us as a member in bad standing?
There is an interesting reference here: # 6.2 Member Commitment. Each Contributing Member shall make available to the # I2O SIG one or more employees, on an as needed basis, competent to # further the purposes and objectives of the I2O SIG. # [...]
This assumes that all Contributing Members have employees, so could the Administrator throw out a Contributing Member for simply having no employees, thereby 1) making it look like they didn't do their fair share & 2) avoid a vote...
Has anybody pointed out this section to the steering committee? # 9.2 Publication of the I2O Specification. # a. Upon the adoption of the I2O Specification Version 1.0 as set forth # above, the I2O Specification will be made available for public use # through the use of a reasonable and non-discriminatory licensing # arrangement as established by the Steering Committee.
Is it just me, or is a NDA of this sort both un-reasonable and discriminatory?
This is way off-topic, so is not being posted to linux-kernel. Feel free to fwd it.
-=- James Mastros
| |