lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1997]   [Jul]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.0.31 : please!


On Wed, 16 Jul 1997, Daniel G. Link wrote:

> If this would be checked by about 10 people with reasonable configurations
> (recent GCC, binutils), it would not go unnoticed.
[...]
> If there is a reason why non-compiling code has to be in the kernel
> sources (I would be hard-pressed to find one), then at least there should
> be a file "LATEST_COMPILING_<whatever>_IS_<version number>" in the kernel
> source directory.
[...]
> Like I said, I would volunteer to test-compile 2.1.X kernels.

Why not set up a group of peopleto do this - test the 2.1.x kernels as
they are released. Then, post a summary of your findings to the kernel
list so people can judge if they want to try it or not.



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:39    [W:0.102 / U:1.760 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site