[lkml]   [1997]   [Jul]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: 2.0.31 : please!
    On Jul 13, Alan Cox wrote
    > > Maybe we need to take matters into our own hand? Lets put out a 2.0.31
    > > that fixes those bugs and announce it on comp.os.linux.announce.
    > > 2.0.X seems abandoned to me.
    > Thats the wrong way to do it. The right way is to join in working and
    > collecting info for 2.0.31, or putting out modified code that isnt called
    > 2.0.31 but is labelled otherwise. A good example was the 1.2.13lmp project
    > (Linux maintenance project) which produced 1.2.x fixes/updates until
    > very recently to get the absolutely maximally stable 1.2.x kernel.
    > Alan

    Now that the buffer cache stuff appears to be cleaned up, is there a complete
    list of problems still left in 2.0.x? It seems that if there was a clear list
    of known problems it would help so that we could systematically attack them.


    Erik B. Andersen Web:
    --This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:39    [W:0.026 / U:54.364 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site