Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 30 Jun 1997 22:45:47 +0200 | From | Harald Koenig <> | Subject | Re: patch for apm_bios.c (kernel 2.0.30) |
| |
On Jun 30, Keith Rohrer wrote:
> Related question: If I build a kernel for x86 but change HZ to, say, 200 > or 500 or 1000, will I (a) get more frequent scheduling, (b) almost get > more frequent scheduling except for bugs hard-coding an HZ==100 assumption, > (c) get a total mess, or (d) get a total mess and get flamed to RTFS?
I'd say (a). there are at least not too many hard-coded HZ==100 assumptions since Linux works fine with DEC Alpha which uses HZ==1024 ...
Harald -- All SCSI disks will from now on ___ _____ be required to send an email notice 0--,| /OOOOOOO\ 24 hours prior to complete hardware failure! <_/ / /OOOOOOOOOOO\ \ \/OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO\ \ OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO|// Harald Koenig, \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ Inst.f.Theoret.Astrophysik // / \\ \ koenig@tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de ^^^^^ ^^^^^
| |