lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1997]   [Jun]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: most "stable" devel kernel?
In article <Pine.LNX.3.91.970617091350.1055A-100000@chaos.analogic.com> you write:
>On Tue, 17 Jun 1997, Erv Walter wrote:
>
>> However, can anyone give me their opinion on which of recent 2.1.x
>> kernels seems to be the most "stable?" I have heard 2.1.3[67].
>
>Version 2.1.42 works very well, both SMP and non SMP. It has the usual
>memory allocation problems being worked on and a few other bugs. But
>it doesn't crash.

Humm... I experienced several solid freezes with 2.1.42 while accessing
the floppy and the sound device in the same time. But maybe this was due
to the sound driver I got directly from oss ftp site. The kernel seemed
to be quite stable otherwise, at least on my single-pentium computer.

--Thomas Pornin

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:39    [W:0.057 / U:0.556 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site