Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 17 Jun 1997 09:19:15 -0400 (EDT) | From | "Richard B. Johnson" <> | Subject | Re: most "stable" devel kernel? |
| |
On Tue, 17 Jun 1997, Erv Walter wrote:
> However, can anyone give me their opinion on which of recent 2.1.x > kernels seems to be the most "stable?" I have heard 2.1.3[67].
Version 2.1.42 works very well, both SMP and non SMP. It has the usual memory allocation problems being worked on and a few other bugs. But it doesn't crash.
Cheers, DJ -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Richard B. Johnson Analogic Corporation Email : rjohnson@analogic.com, johnson@analogic.com Penguin : Linux version 2.1.42 on an i586 machine (66.15 BogoMips). Warning : It's hard to stay on the trailing edge of technology. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
| |