lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1997]   [Jun]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: most "stable" devel kernel?
On Tue, 17 Jun 1997, Erv Walter wrote:

> However, can anyone give me their opinion on which of recent 2.1.x
> kernels seems to be the most "stable?" I have heard 2.1.3[67].

Version 2.1.42 works very well, both SMP and non SMP. It has the usual
memory allocation problems being worked on and a few other bugs. But
it doesn't crash.

Cheers,
DJ
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Richard B. Johnson
Analogic Corporation
Email : rjohnson@analogic.com, johnson@analogic.com
Penguin : Linux version 2.1.42 on an i586 machine (66.15 BogoMips).
Warning : It's hard to stay on the trailing edge of technology.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:39    [W:0.052 / U:0.528 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site