lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1997]   [May]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: loop driver (was Loop Encryption)
Date
> Sorry if this has already been overdiscussed.

I don't think it has, but feel free to move it off the list
and into personal e-mail if you want.

> (A) This issue has nothing to do with law. It's US Regulations
> that are the issue. Regulations can be changed at a whim (and
> this year, encryption is not a munitions issue but a commerce
> issue).

I'm not a lawyer. Laws and regulations are for my purposes
the same - breaking them can have dire consequences.

> (B) The regulations are totally ambiguous.

<sigh> no kidding. Just like the CIA web pages (not a joke)

> You might argue that linux is an encryption item. If so, you're
> full of shit. http://www.eff.org/bernstein/Legal/961206.decision
> for an example of what might happen if this ever goes to court.

My stand is simple - Linux has encryption hooks in it _NOW_ (v2.1.36)
and I want to remove them. I also want to add support for things
like loadable loop compressors (like PPP has BSD compression module).
I want the results of this to be freely distributable.

BTW, I'm about 90% finished the kernel code. I've documented the entire
driver too, and have been looking for a possible race bug. I've finished
the first module for the transformation "none", and will do one for XOR
for kernel distribution (it is a good example of how to pass data to
a transformation module). I'll have to patch both "mount" and "losetup"
too before the kernel patch is practical though.

--
Andrew E. Mileski mailto:aem@netcom.ca
Linux Plug-and-Play Hardware Support http://www.redhat.com/linux-info/pnp/
XFree86 Matrox Team http://www.bf.rmit.edu.au/~ajv/xf86-matrox.html

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:39    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans