Messages in this thread | | | From | (Miquel van Smoorenburg) | Subject | Re: UseNet Gateway Design | Date | 28 May 1997 21:48:22 +0200 |
| |
In article <Pine.LNX.3.96.970528114606.24213A-100000@miriam.fuller.edu>, Christoph Lameter <clameter@waterf.org> wrote: >Here is a test message to show how message will look like after passing >through the gateway: > >Path: miriam.fuller.edu!gateway >From: spam-registration@news.fuller.edu (No E-mail please) >Newsgroups: linux.test >Subject: test >Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.970528112346.29574A-100000@waterf.org> >Date: 28 May 97 18:23:51 GMT >Sender: spam-registration@news.fuller.edu >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII >Lines: 5 >Xref: miriam.fuller.edu linux.test:10
Hmm would it be too hard to:
a. leave the full name in b. change the email address to [base64 real email address encoded]-linux-test@news.fuller.edu
If an email then comes to that address, and it's a Reply: to an earlier message (check References: and/or Re: in subject line) forward the email to the real sender. Otherwise it's spam.
I'm considering doing this for my own usenet messages.
Mike. -- | Miquel van Smoorenburg | "I need more space" "Well, why not move to Texas" | | miquels@cistron.nl | "No, on my account, stupid." "Stupid? Uh-oh.." | | PGP fingerprint: FE 66 52 4F CD 59 A5 36 7F 39 8B 20 F1 D6 74 02 |
| |