Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 1 May 1997 09:22:04 +0100 (GMT/BST) | From | Mike Jagdis <> | Subject | Re: procfs problems |
| |
On Wed, 30 Apr 1997, Tim Hollebeek wrote:
> How much more complex is a /bin/proccat that (for example) changes null > terminated key:value pairs into text? E.g. the proc files would contain > something like: > > "key1\0val1\0key2\0val2\0..." > > which would translate to: > > key1 : val1 > key2 : val2 > ...
What on earth *FOR*??? It's not that much more difficult to parse the human readable version anyway. Anyone who can't write the code has better things to worry about than kernel hacking anyway :-).
I think the point of this thread got lost a good few messages back...
Mike
-- .----------------------------------------------------------------------. | Mike Jagdis | Internet: mailto:mike@roan.co.uk | | Roan Technology Ltd. | | | 54A Peach Street, Wokingham | Telephone: +44 118 989 0403 | | RG40 1XG, ENGLAND | Fax: +44 118 989 1195 | `----------------------------------------------------------------------'
| |