Messages in this thread | | | From | (Alan Cox) | Subject | Re: SMP should be CONFIG_SMP and exclusive of APM? | Date | Wed, 9 Apr 1997 23:49:23 +0100 (BST) |
| |
> Since SMP has a bad conflict with APM (in arch/i386/kernel/process.c, I > think), the config process should not ask for APM if SMP = 1 in the > makefile, at least until APM (or the busy calls, etc.) are supported under > SMP.
One problem is the APM bios isnt defined to be SMP safe in any docs I have I'd love to call APM if someone has APM docs confirming APM is SMP safe or has SMP extensions in docs I don't posess
Any intel folks listening >
| |