lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1997]   [Apr]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: SMP should be CONFIG_SMP and exclusive of APM?
Date
> Since SMP has a bad conflict with APM (in arch/i386/kernel/process.c, I
> think), the config process should not ask for APM if SMP = 1 in the
> makefile, at least until APM (or the busy calls, etc.) are supported under
> SMP.

One problem is the APM bios isnt defined to be SMP safe in any docs I have
I'd love to call APM if someone has APM docs confirming APM is SMP safe or
has SMP extensions in docs I don't posess

Any intel folks listening >


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:39    [W:0.052 / U:0.620 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site