lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1997]   [Apr]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
SubjectRe: Unresolved module symbols in 2.1.32 without SMP
Date
On Sat, 05 Apr 1997 23:53:40 -0500, you wrote:

> >Maybe it would be a good idea to wrap both the declaration and the definition
> >inside ifdef __SMP__.
>
> The following patch should go into 2.1.33 (I lost the e-mail address of the
> original poster, but Ingo Molnar and I agree on this one):
>
> [patch skipped]

Yes, that works nicely. Along the same lines, here's a patch for
arch/i386/kernel/irq.c which seems to do no harm.

Thanks

--------------------------------------
--- linux/arch/i386/kernel/irq.c.orig Sat Apr 5 18:59:09 1997
+++ linux/arch/i386/kernel/irq.c Sun Apr 6 00:36:43 1997
@@ -40,7 +40,9 @@
static unsigned char cache_21 = 0xff;
static unsigned char cache_A1 = 0xff;

+#ifdef __SMP__
unsigned int local_irq_count[NR_CPUS];
+#endif

#ifdef __SMP_PROF__
static unsigned int int_count[NR_CPUS][NR_IRQS] = {{0},};


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:39    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans