lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1997]   [Apr]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Solaris sources
On Wed, 30 Apr 1997, Dan Hollis wrote:

> On Wed, 30 Apr 1997, Michael Nelson wrote:
> > On 30 Apr 1997, stephen farrell wrote:
> > > otoh, what worries me about it, however, is i think this makes solaris
> > > look like a joke to the microsoft people. NT source code is highly
> > > protected, and it is an easy assumption that there is a direct
> > > relationship between protection of code and value of said code (albeit
> > > largely wrong).
> > It's available for education license (has been for many years), just like
> > Solaris now is.
>
> Really? Has anyone actually purchased it? If so, who specifically?

Yes, several well-known CS-related universities have. The message passed
through my mailbox a couple of years ago and I can't remember who they
anymore. Sorry.

-mike



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:39    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans