lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1997]   [Apr]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
Newsgroups: linux.dev.kernel
Path: eesrjhc
From: Roger Hill-Cottingham <eesrjhc@ee.bath.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: URGENT: A Plea to the owners of linux.dev.kernel
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: eesrjhc@bath.ac.uk (Verified by Kerberos)
Organization: University of Bath
Message-ID: <3343B0AC.41C6@ee.bath.ac.uk>
References: <199704021759.MAA00370@jenolan.caipgeneral> <Pine.LNX.3.95.970402144244.662A-100000@hulk.oit.unc.edu>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (X11; I; OSF1 V2.0 alpha)
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: tobi.bath.ac.uk
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 1997 13:27:43 GMT

Terence J. McDevitt wrote:
>
> I subscribed to this list because I saw the name "linux-kernel".
> To me, this name does not imply development only questions. So when I ask
> a question about upgrading to a newer kernel and everyone jumps all over
> me about it, maybe there's a reason I'm posting a question like that. I
> don't mind going to another list, but again, by the way it reads, this is
> not a list devoted to developers...
>
> Terence J. McDevitt
>
> BTW - Thanks to all who have offered help without getting upset about
> it...

Sorry, Terence, but what exactly did you think the 'dev' in
linux.dev.kernel
meant, if not developer (or development)?

I must say that I agree entirely with Todd Lewis's original posting.

Cheers,
Roger.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:39    [W:0.036 / U:1.656 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site