[lkml]   [1997]   [Apr]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: thousands of threads & kernel continuations

    Floody wrote on 4/28/97 1:29 pm:

    > You can only have one
    >process per processor, so
    >what's the point of
    >multi-processing (beyond
    >the number of physical
    >processors you have).

    The point is that you may have some of the processes in a state where they
    cannot run at a given instant. What makes the most sense is an intelligent
    combination of queues for some sorts of waiting processes and blocked
    threads for others. What is intelligent? Queues make sense when processes
    will behave according to a good queue discipline, (they will not
    asynchronously defect too often, etc.) But when the blocked process may do
    all sorts of different things before the thing it is ostensibly blocked
    for, queueing may be a loss.

    Note that a not good enough queue can easily become a loss just by slowing
    down to the point where nobody wants to wait long enough to get served.

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:39    [W:0.017 / U:37.716 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site