Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 11 Apr 1997 14:08:48 -0400 (EDT) | From | "Seth M. Landsman" <> | Subject | Re: Kernel testing |
| |
On Fri, 11 Apr 1997, Oliver Xymoron wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Apr 1997, Seth M. Landsman wrote: > > > A sick thought crossed my mind ... What if we doing something > > similar to what the cryptography folks are doing. Have people run the > > stress test when they want, how ever long they want, and have it > > communicate with a main server someplace which will keep track of these > > things ... > > I think I mentioned something like this in my initial message. The > simplest way to do this would be with (possibly PGPed) automated email > reports to a database building engine.
Probably should have read the first message more carefully ... :)
Anyways, I don't know if PGP would be necessary, we wouldn't be sending anything critical, I'd hope. The implementation method is a different matter entirely, something to be discussed sometime in the future ...
What is the general consensus? Do we have the blessing of the Powers-That-Be to go ahead and try to break this kernel and all kernels the days to come? :)
-Seth
| |