Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 25 Mar 1997 19:36:48 -0500 (EST) | From | Jon Lewis <> | Subject | Re: >256 fd patch... |
| |
On Wed, 26 Mar 1997, Oskar Pearson wrote:
> > Do you have to "do" anything to libc? Or just build it? > I am just re-building it. I believe that this was needed with the previous > patches (I think that things like "open" wouldn't allow people to open > more than X fd's if they used the libc stuff. Tell me if I am wrong, people)
With michael's >256 fd patch, open does work without hacking libc.
I'm still getting an unusual amount of "Couldn't get a free page....." messages running with this patch. My IRC server / mail relay has been running 2.0.29 with this patch for 5 days.
------------------------------------------------------------------ Jon Lewis <jlewis@fdt.net> | Unsolicited commercial e-mail will Network Administrator | be proof-read for $199/hr. ________Finger jlewis@inorganic5.fdt.net for PGP public key_______
| |