lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1997]   [Feb]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]   [less markup]   [headers]   [forward]  
 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From"Andrew E. Mileski" <>
SubjectRe: BUG in irq.c?
DateSun, 16 Feb 1997 00:01:56 -0500 (EST)
>    linux-2.1.26/arch/i386/kernel/irq.c
>    221:  static struct irqaction *irq_action[16] = {
>    480:  void free_irq(unsigned int irq, void *dev_id)
>    497:		if (!irq[irq_action]) {
> 			^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>    Playing dumb - Shouldn't this be "irq_action[irq]"?
> 
> It is the same thing.  The joys C pointer calculations...

Okay, I can see it now...but IMHO it really should be changed
because it is not intuitive (at least for me).

--
Andrew E. Mileski   mailto:aem@netcom.ca
Linux Plug-and-Play Kernel Project http://www.redhat.com/linux-info/pnp/
XFree86 Matrox Team http://www.bf.rmit.edu.au/~ajv/xf86-matrox.html

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:38    [from the cache]
©2003-2008