lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1997]   [Dec]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: <changed> Cyrix opt's
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

would it be worth the time to get egcs or pgcc and
compiling with pent/Ppro
ops??, would I see any improvements??


At 03:52 AM 12/28/97 -0600, kwrohrer@enteract.com wrote:
>Because, unless you're using egcs or pgcc, the only
differences (in
>general) will be the alignments; no pentium or ppro-
specific optimizations
>are done by gcc. So, smaller binaries will take less
memory bandwidth,
>less cache (and VM) footprint, less disk loading
time...and thus be faster.
>Some of these reasons motivated CISC in the first place...

> Keith
>
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0
Charset: noconv

iQA/AwUBNKYrAT3adekLPoD6EQLMHACdFZprog/13l6SVEsUB4fIzY8mtlQAn1zp
Vw8uzMC2ijKL8k7VFUtE6GzO
=RMVf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:40    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans