lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1997]   [Dec]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Making module versions (Was: OFFTOPIC: binary modules, bad idea!)
> I guess he meant:
>
> - make foo.ver.tmp depend on foo.c
> - use cp-if-changed to get foo.ver
> - things that depend on foo.ver still depend on it
>
> To pull this off, foo.ver.tmp and foo.ver may have to be handled by
> different make invocations.

This would work, a typical linux compilation would then say

make dep modversions bzlilo modules modules_install

Is this really what we want? I would rather have make decide that the
dependencies and the module versions are not up-to-date, and
modules_install decide that the modules are not up-to-date.

Martin

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:40    [W:0.078 / U:0.424 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site