Messages in this thread |  | | | Subject | Re: two things | | From | Benny Amorsen <> | | Date | 18 Dec 1997 16:58:20 +0100 |
| |
>>>>> "CSA" == C Scott Ananian <cananian@lcs.mit.edu> writes:
CSA> My understanding is that the current nonexec-stack patch works so CSA> well because it cleverly disables itself when it detects code CSA> that will break. Although this does make it compatible, it CSA> doesn't make it secure. Solutions to these problems have been CSA> rumoured for Linux 2.3.X.
We should not fix the problem in the case where it _can_ be solved, just because there are cases where it cannot?
Benny
|  |