Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 18 Dec 1997 08:54:00 -0500 | From | Bill Hawes <> | Subject | Re: 2.1.72 /proc, was: Re: /proc/memmap [name from inode?] |
| |
Chris Evans wrote:
> Oh, here's something you can do to a 2.1.72 kernel, that's fairly nasty: > (as root): > > rm -f /proc/net/arp > > I'm currently messing with the /proc code, so might sort it out.
I added unlink support to /proc as an experiment, as in principle there's no reason that a dynamic entry shouldn't use it. But if some don't entries don't want to be removed (or will need changes to support it), there should probably be a flag indicating whether the unlink should be ignored.
Regards, Bill
| |