[lkml]   [1997]   [Dec]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Mmap device performance
In article <19971210092943.51142@jolt>, Daryll Strauss  <> wrote:
>On the PPro and PII boxes the performance is roughly half what it is
>under Windows. Since the application is identical, and the interface to
>the card is simply writing to a memory mapped region so it seems that
>the degradation must be happening somewhere in the kernel layers. I'm
>currently mapping the region shared with read/write access.

One thing to look out for is the "memory type registers" on the PPro and
the PII. Somebody had a kernel loadable module to read and set the
registers, it may be that your windows setup has a different memory type
setup than the Linux setup.

Similarly, when you do the mapping, look into the effects of the "cache
disable" and "write-through" bits in the page tables. You mention that
you copied the code from the /dev/mem map code, and that code does:

#if defined(__i386__)
* hmm.. This disables high-memory caching, as the XFree86 team
* wondered about that at one time.
* The surround logic should disable caching for the high device
* addresses anyway, but right now this seems still needed.
if (x86 > 3 && offset >= __pa(high_memory))
pgprot_val(vma->vm_page_prot) |= _PAGE_PCD;

the code _shouldn't_ make any difference (as per the comment), but
depending on how the card works it might.


 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:40    [W:0.073 / U:3.936 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site