Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 18 Nov 1997 20:20:07 +0100 (MET) | From | Jean-Francois Micouleau <> | Subject | Re: Opinion re 2.0.30->2.0.32 in stable production servers? |
| |
On Tue, 18 Nov 1997, Alan Cox wrote:
> 1. 2.0.32 has a different teardrop patch > > > Second, your opinion please: for production servers do you believe > > 2.0.32 is or will prove to be superior to and more stable than 2.0.30, > > where the servers in question have been seen to be capable of uptimes > > in excess of one month on 2.0.30 without intervention (e.g. me > > Yes. Well I hope so anyway, it has nothing in it but fixes to bugs. Nothing > new at all > OK, explain me then, why when trying to login on an SMP production machine under 2.0.32 I had: Fork failed or No more process in a telnet session. Control+scrollLock showed me only 200 process in zombie state. The last stable version was 2.0.31-pre10 with an uptime of more than 30 days and not a problem until I rebooted to test 2.0.31 (a big mistake) !
Jean Francois
----------------------------------------------------------- : Jean Francois Micouleau : Email: jfm@utc.fr : : Universite de : Tel : 03 44 23 47 78 : : Technologie de : Service Informatique : : Compiegne France : Division IRNM : -----------------------------------------------------------
| |