Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Sun, 05 Oct 1997 13:26:40 -0400 | | From | Bill Hawes <> | | Subject | Re: Can we make smbfs standalone? |
| |
Marty Leisner wrote: > > Can we make smbfs a standalone module (like ntfs?) > > All this would involve is moving the smbfs headers into the > source directory instead of include (I don't think anyone > else needs them).
The smbfs has structures that are incorporated into inodes and superblocks as a union, so this limits the degree to which the code can be separated.
I understand that it's not very convenient to keep applying the snapshot patches I've been sending out -- my source tree is getting more and more out of sync with 2.1.57, so it's getting difficult for me to issue patches that compile cleanly. Hopefully this will get cleared up soon when Linus returns ...
Regards, Bill
|  |