Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Ugh in 2.1.60 | Date | Fri, 31 Oct 1997 15:10:19 +0000 | From | David Woodhouse <> |
| |
whawes@star.net said: > That sounds good -- maybe print just one message, and identify the > file and line number. It would be good to get this all cleared up > before 2.2.
Isn't it a bit difficult to get "file and line number" information? Personally, I liked the approach that I saw in a recent 2.1 kernel:
if (code has done somthing wrong) *(int *)0=0;
I've forgotten where it was now, but it definitely made sure the offending code was fixed :)
| |