lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1997]   [Jan]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: Linux vs. NT for Developers
Date
Juergen Sauer  <jojo@sae.extern.fh-hannover.de> wrote:
> - may be hard to find a --- M$ tends to drop pre Alphas in
> productionlevel rock stable system wide field tests. (I/O Bug in 4.0)

Au contraire, I've been running production level Linux systems since
0.99.something, over the 1.0.9 and 1.2.15 range, now with
2.0.something, sometimes under heavy load, always with uptime in the
range of months and no kernel crashes.

So much for "rock solid". A definitive ++ for Linux.

olaf
--
___ Olaf.Titz@inka.de or @{stud,informatik}.uni-karlsruhe.de ____
__ o <URL:http://www.inka.de/~bigred/> <IRC:praetorius>
__/<_ >> Just as long as the wheels keep on turning round
_)>(_)______________ I will live for the groove 'til the sun goes down << ____
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:38    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site