[lkml]   [1997]   [Jan]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Good point of Linux over Windows NT
    David S. Miller wrote:
    > Kernel level support for async-IO is something that should be at least
    > thought about. From the UNIX's that I've heard actually do it, they
    > limit you to one outstanding async-IO request per task/thread. This
    > seems to suggest it is not a trivial problem to solve at all.
    > From what I've heard NT allows numerous (unlimited?) outstanding
    > async-IO requests to be queued to the system, and programmers love
    > this. Can someone validate this? It's what I've heard, I want to
    > know if it is true.

    This is true. What NT has is an IRP (I/O request packet) stack.
    Each new request for I/O gets thrown on the stack. (Actually, it
    is really a fifo, but they call it a stack.) The system will
    handle this by default, but the device driver can choose to manage
    it own IRP queues. When a packet has been processed, you can mark
    the packet as done. This signals the user level that the packet
    has been emptied or filled or whatever.

    Gordon Chaffee

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:38    [W:0.018 / U:18.176 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site