![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 1997 16:03:20 +0100 (MET) From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@pc5829.hil.siemens.at> is anyone using HZ=1000 plus kernel profiling? The profiling output should get sqrt(10) more precision this way ... [just wanted to know wether i have to back up my HD before trying it :)] It has been done on the Sparc. In fact I think we got it clicking up to a HZ of 10,000 at one point. The profiling was so fine that you could actually see exactly which load/store instructions were missing the cache more often than others in memcpy/memset/csum_partial etc. Pipeline stalls were extremely visible as well. ---------------------------------------------//// Yow! 11.26 MB/s remote host TCP bandwidth & //// 199 usec remote TCP latency over 100Mb/s //// ethernet. Beat that! //// -----------------------------------------////__________ o David S. Miller, davem@caip.rutgers.edu /_____________/ / // /_/ >< | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:38 [W:0.168 / U:0.040 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||