![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Thu, 16 Jan 1997, Christian Kirsch wrote: > > Alan Cox wrote: > > > > I'm much more concerned about having _correct_ drivers than ones that happen > > to compile. > > This is a very subtle and fine point that I'm probably not intelligent enough to understand: A > driver that fails to compile but still works. Mut be something virtual ;-) Alan is very good in saying 'all' with an absolute minimum of words. ;-) A driver that has been proven to be _correct_ implies beeing successfully compiled. However, a driver that just successfully compiles does _not_ imply beeing correct (though it may). So, nothing 'virtual', just pure logic. Hans <lermen@fgan.de> | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:38 [W:0.063 / U:0.110 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||