lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1997]   [Jan]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: modutils, the next generation
Date
From
Martin,
you can call me paranoid, but if you have a random object file and you don't
know what it is, I'd question your sanity if you think it's a good idea to
just insmod it regardless of the name (.o/.klm/.destroy_my_machine) :-)

Surely you keep your kernel modules in a (secure) well known location ???

t

In message <9701151830.AA01618@dcl.MIT.EDU>,"Theodore Y. Ts'o" writes:
> Date: Wed, 15 Jan 97 11:11 MET
> From: Martin Buck <Martin-2.Buck@student.uni-ulm.de>
>
> Yes, but wouldn't it be nice to see whether an object file actually is a
> kernel module before you try to insmod it? Of course, you could use nm and
> look for the required symbols, but making it obvious from the filename
> looks like a good idea to me. Please note that I'm not talking about sanit
> y
> checks insmod has to do; all I want is to make it easier for the user to
> distinguish between normal object files and objects files that can be
> loaded into a kernel.
>
> Right now kernel modules are in well-defined places in the filesystem.
> (/lib/modules, etc.) So while I see your point, I'm not sure how much
> different it really makes in the actual practice.
>
> - Ted
>
--
Tim Wright, Worldwide Technical Services, | Email: timw@sequent.com
Sequent Computer Systems Inc., 15450, |
SW Koll Parkway, Beaverton, Oregon 97006 | Phone: +1-503-578-3822
"Applying computer technology is simply finding the right wrench to pound
in the correct screw"


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:38    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site