Messages in this thread | | | From | Stefan Bosnjakovic <> | Subject | AW: Again: Maquerading FireWall Feature and New Init behaviour ! | Date | Fri, 10 Jan 1997 10:53:56 +-100 |
| |
Hi Greg !
---------- Von: Greg Alexander[SMTP:galexand@sietch.bloomington.in.us] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 09. Jänner 1997 02:28 An: Stefan Bosnjakovic Betreff: Re: Again: Maquerading FireWall Feature and New Init behaviour !
Er, I just remembered where you can find these patches. http://www.ecsnet.com/ has a list of 2.1 patches, including the masquerading one.
I tried that - compiled fine, but same effect. Maybe it´s a general forwarding problem - I´ll try to find out more about that.
Cheers, Stefan !
On Thu, 9 Jan 1997, Greg Alexander wrote:
> I know that in 2.1.16-2.1.17, masquerading was broken. It may not have > been fixed until 2.1.20 or it may still not have been fixed. Anyways, > here's the patch that I used: > Hrm. Bummer. I think I deleted it. that was smart. Ho hum. You can > prolly find it yourself. Search on one of the archives for the beginning > of december or maybe end of november. Search for titles with "masq" in > them. > > On Wed, 8 Jan 1997, Stefan Bosnjakovic wrote: > > > Hi Everybody ! > > > > Sorry for posting it again - but I received no answer until now. > > Maybe this time! Anyway I added some more info to it. > > So here we go again: > > > > Please excuse me if I´m wasting bandwidth and this question is already > > answered elsewhere already, but I would need to get the Masquerading > > IP-Firewall feature together with the Traffic Shaper function (that´s the reason > > why I use the 2.1.x kernels) to work. > > The transparent masquerading works quite well for me with the 2.0.25/27 kernel, > > but it does not seem to forward anything with 2.1.17-2.1.19. Any ideas? > > I use the SuSE distribution rel 4.4, but installed the following patches: > > LibC: 5.4.1.7 > > LibC++: 2.7.2.1 > > BinUtils: 2.7.0.3 > > Insmod: 2.0.0 > > Procps: 1.01 > > SysVinit: 2.69 > > ld.so: 1.8.5 > > SysKlogd: 1.3-3 > > Mount: 2.5p > > Net-Tools: 1.32-alpha > > Kbd: 0.91 > > > > I can ping stations on both ethernets, and "netstat -r" shows everything OK. > > If i boot kernel 2.0.25 it forwards and masques packets, with the 2.1.x it doesn´t. > > > > I compile all option directly into the kernel - not as a loadable module, if that matters. > > Also those that make modules would generate, I changed that. > > > > Other odd thing: with the new init it obviously does not start /sbin/init.d/boot > > automatically, as it did with my original distribution. No matter if I use the 2.0.x or 2.1.x kernel. > > So I added an "ln -s /sbin/init.d/boot /sbin/init.d/rc2.d/S00boot". That seems to fix that > > problem - is that a viable solution ? > > > > Also the /etc/route.conf needs editing when I switch the two kernel releases. > > Cheers, Stefan ! > > > > stefan@nces.co.at > > > > > > > > Greg Alexander > http://www.cia-g.com/~sietch/ > >
Greg Alexander http://www.cia-g.com/~sietch/
| |