[lkml]   [1996]   [Jul]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: This is really Ridiculous
    Excerpts from internet.computing.linux-kernel: 27-Jul-96 Re: This is
    really Ridiculous by Michael E. Chastain@dura
    > I think that some of the changes introduced since 2.0 were too big for a
    > 2.0 release.
    > I also think that the version numbering scheme is inadequate. When
    > there are bug fixes applied to 2.0.N, the new version doesn't deserve to
    > be 2.0.N+1 right away. It should be 2.0.N+1.beta for a few days first.

    The current versioning scheme seems adequate to me, but I think 2.0 was
    released prematurely. More thorough testing was needed in the end of
    the 1.3 series, er, excuse me, the 1.99/pre2.0 series.

    Is there some automated way to make sure all different possible
    configurations (or at least a frequently-used subset of those) will
    If Linus would only test the code to make sure it compiles in different
    configurations, that would catch many of the stupid little "bugs" we
    always see.

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:38    [W:0.018 / U:32.900 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site