[lkml]   [1996]   [Jul]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: SCSI device numbering (was: Re: Ideas for v2.1
      Date: Tue, 2 Jul 1996 08:15:29 +0300 (EET DST)
    From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@cs.Helsinki.FI>

    So something like this:
    - one major number for each SCSI bus (= usually one controller)
    - 4 (8?) bits SCSI ID
    - 7 bits SCSI LUN
    - 4 bits partition information
    - ???

    Yuk. Why should the dev_t need to encode these subsystem specific details?
    I'd much rather see:

    - 12 bits for the major number of each device type pretty much as we
    have now.
    (device types are the things that have a common set of properties)
    - 16 bits for an index into a dynamically allocated dense array of
    pointers to objects of that type
    - 4 bits for partition information or other specialization

    I think that it's the *devices* that are the central objects here, not their
    implementation on specific SCSI channels. I don't see any reason that a dev_t
    needs to map directly to any SCSI details. Each SCSI Device can refer to the
    specific bus, the driver that handles that bus, and whatever details are
    necessary to address that device.

    I think 65536 devices of each type is probably sufficient for the moment. If
    not, we can shrink the major number a bit more. The reason 32 bits aren't
    enough in most of the suggestions I've seen is that we're trying to encode
    irrelevant and unnecessary information into the minor numbers. dev_t does not
    need to be the way of naming devices from the user's perspective.


     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:37    [W:0.016 / U:11.216 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site