[lkml]   [1996]   [Jun]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: possible SCSI device numbering solution
    On Tue, 25 Jun 1996, Andrew E. Mileski wrote:

    > > There is little point going through the disruption that changing it would
    > > be, to change it again, so we may as well go to a 64 bit dev_t. One
    > > thing tho, would we even need more than 65536 major devices? ie 16 bit
    > > major, 48 bit minor (or 281474976710656 minor numbers (2.8*10^14) ;)
    > I'm reminded of somebody saying, "they'll never need more than 640k". :-/
    This really is'nt a problem. If you look back, the capacity of hard
    disks increased, not the number of hard disks in a system. It's much more
    likely that we run in trouble becauce 32 bits are to small to count the
    all the sectors of a disk...


     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:37    [W:0.016 / U:33.428 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site