lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1996]   [Jun]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: your mail
    Date
    > Does this noatime patch really break POSIX conformance? I.e. does it really
    > not update the atimes at all? If it doesn't, wouldn't it be better to put
    > the atime updates in the kernel's disk-write cache and not flush the cache
    > if there are only atime updates to be flushed?

    Yes. But you are allowed in POSIX to have additional non posix features. NFS
    for example is a non POSIX fs, as is the drossfs.

    Alan


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:37    [W:0.017 / U:0.812 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site