lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1996]   [May]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: linux on HFS? why not HPFS instead?
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

    On Thu, 2 May 1996, Simon Karpen wrote:

    karpens} However, this is obviously a pretty long way off as we don't even yet
    karpens} have read-write HPFS support yet.

    I had assumed that the reason for no HPFS write support was that IBM or whoever
    would not release data, or something. I assumed that, since there wasn't even an
    experimental, dangerous, guaranteed-to-trash-your-filesystem read/write HPFS.

    Oh well, it would make more sense to have ext2fs for OS/2, since there are now
    so many more Linux users than OS/2.

    - --
    g-r-a-t-e-f-u-l-l-y---[ email:<fishbowl@conservatory.com> ]---l-i-v-i-n-g
    d-e-a-d-i-c-a-t-e-d---[ http://www.conservatory.com/~fishbowl ]-----l-i-g-h-t
    "His mind is like a steel trap -- full of mice" -- Foghorn Leghorn

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    Version: 2.6.2i

    iQBVAwUBMYoxgcPTedxmOfz5AQEeuAH/Xg0kCOGA+0szoJVsbN/CiUMOju/XhcRQ
    RqwBONw3m5RPMzf0NAEatj6/NJzcEPMT8JANUcy1IRkFs7+F4jd5Bw==
    =bz73
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:37    [W:0.017 / U:1.612 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site