Messages in this thread |  | | | From | Alan Cox <> | | Subject | Re: Sleeping on the job | | Date | Fri, 17 May 1996 15:40:10 +0100 (BST) |
| |
> > there's no mechanism to sleep for less than a scheduler quantum; > > that's 10 ms in normal x86 linux. > Ya, I know that. But do I need to worry about delays that are over
Actually to be more exact:
"There is no wahy to sleep for less than a scheduler quantum except busy waiting UNLESS you are waiting for an interrupt.. which is the normal case"
|  |