[lkml]   [1996]   [May]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Sleeping on the job
    > > there's no mechanism to sleep for less than a scheduler quantum;
    > > that's 10 ms in normal x86 linux.
    > Ya, I know that. But do I need to worry about delays that are over

    Actually to be more exact:

    "There is no wahy to sleep for less than a scheduler quantum except busy
    waiting UNLESS you are waiting for an interrupt.. which is the normal case"

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:37    [W:0.016 / U:1.144 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site