lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1996]   [Apr]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: Kernel functionality in user land
Date
> > 3.) Communication should always (no matter if internal or external) go over
> > the kerneld message queue (Is the overhead bearable for internal
> > communication? Is the kerneld message queue concept powerful enough? Can
> > the kerneld message queue be used for inside-kernel communication?)
> > This would give us much common code between internal and external
> > features.

isn't this more what the kernel network link was written for?

--
-fuZZy, paramour to the lady mindy

<did they buy it?>
<I don't think they bought it.>
<of course they bought it.>
<shush, they're looking this way, remember to keep a straight face...>


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:37    [W:0.036 / U:0.340 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site