Messages in this thread | | | From | fuZZy <> | Subject | Re: Kernel functionality in user land | Date | Thu, 4 Apr 1996 05:20:02 -0500 (EST) |
| |
> > 3.) Communication should always (no matter if internal or external) go over > > the kerneld message queue (Is the overhead bearable for internal > > communication? Is the kerneld message queue concept powerful enough? Can > > the kerneld message queue be used for inside-kernel communication?) > > This would give us much common code between internal and external > > features.
isn't this more what the kernel network link was written for?
-- -fuZZy, paramour to the lady mindy
<did they buy it?> <I don't think they bought it.> <of course they bought it.> <shush, they're looking this way, remember to keep a straight face...>
| |