Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 28 Apr 1996 13:15:51 -0400 (EDT) | From | Moltar Ramone <> | Subject | A (brief) plea against version 2.0 |
| |
(Gosh I hope I don't start a flamewar on this... my mailbox is full enough)
I just wanted to put in my vote for the next "release" version of Linux being numbered 1.4.
I guess it's a qualitative judgement, but I feel that there's a problem in the software world with version number inflation, and it would be nice to see Linux take a stand against this.
Before I see version 2.0, I'd like to see fully working (well, that's sorta ridiculous, but at least more than "more-or-less working") multiplatform support including the PowerMac. I don't use, or plan on using, the PowerMac, but aside from x86 chips it may be the most popular newish processor available. From what I understand, I wouldn't want to use most of the non-x86 platforms in a production environment yet.
What I'm saying is just that 2.0 should be _fully_ functional, and stable, in whatever environments it's released for. While I'd like 1.4 to be the same, I wouldn't expect it to be. I think it's too early to make determinations as to stability of various ports, anyway.
Another thing I'd like to see before 2.0 is a fully modularized driver set (and I do mean _fully_), and a working kernel daemon. Seeing as kerneld was just disabled, I don't really expect to see that very soon. (Of course, I'd love to be proved wrong).
The last thing I'd want to wait for before releasing a version numbered 2.0 is fully functional plug-and-play support. (Of course, this might _never_ happen, because P-n-P is a satanic Microsoft creation, but here's hoping...)
I think we do need another stable kernel platform now. I just think it should be numbered 1.4 :)
Jon Lasser ---------- Jon Lasser (410)494-3072 - Obscenity is a crutch for jlasser@rwd.goucher.edu inarticulate motherfuckers. http://www.goucher.edu/~jlasser/ Finger for PGP key (1024/EC001E4D) - Fuck the CDA.
| |