[lkml]   [1996]   [Apr]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: 1.3.95 is not stable
    [This is my second reply to this message, I have new data to add]

    >>>>> "Linus" == Linus Torvalds <torvalds@cs.Helsinki.FI> writes:

    Linus> The crash you see is due to memory corruption in the kernel
    Linus> (the function "handle_signal()" to be exact): the code sequence
    Linus> _should_ be

    Linus> addl $0x10,%esp
    Linus> cmpl $0x0,0x8(%ebx)
    Linus> jnl <handle_signal+106>

    Linus> which is "0x83 0xc4 0x10 0x83 0x7b 0x08 0x00 0x7d 0x06". Your panic
    Linus> reports "0x83 0x84 0x10 0x83 0x7b 0x08 0x00 0x7d 0x06".

    Linus> Note the _one_bit_ error in the second byte... (0xc4 has become
    Linus> a 0x84).

    I was able to duplicate this crash (with the same 1 bit error in the
    same place) in a variety of motherboard settings with the common
    element being enabled external caching. I'm now running (and have
    about 4 hours of stable uptime) with external caching disabled.

    Can these crashes be explained by bad external cache?
    -- baur
    Unsolicited commercial e-mail will be proofread for $250/hour.
    Andrea Seastrand: For your vote on the Telecom bill, I will vote for anyone
    except you in November.

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:37    [W:0.021 / U:13.320 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site