[lkml]   [1996]   [Mar]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: nfsroot anyone?
       From: (Gero Kuhlmann)
    Date: Sun, 17 Mar 1996 21:58:41 +0100 (MET)

    I'm going to take a look into this ASAP. However, I don't think implemen-
    ting BOOTP into the kernel (as with 1.3.75) is such a good idea. It blows
    up the kernel binary for being used just once. This should instead go into
    the bootrom, which then sends the necessary parameters from the BOOTP
    handling to the kernel with the appropriate kernel command line parameters.
    This also reduces the number of BOOTP requests from one client. Other-
    wise, the bootrom sends a request, then the kernel, and finally a BOOTP
    user process. So, why should we implement BOOTP into the kernel? IMHO, we
    should discuss this further.

    Bzzt, wrong answer, on the Sparc for example putting this into the
    kernel is the _only_ way to acquire the functionality. We do not have
    the option of reblowing our PROM's on SparcStations.

    David S. Miller

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:36    [W:0.016 / U:54.016 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site