lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1996]   [Dec]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: PNP patch into kernel when?

On Wed, 4 Dec 1996, Andrew E. Mileski wrote:

> I think this squashes all the complaints put forward so far.
> If not, please remind me.

I've just been looking at the PnP patch in slightly more detail. Is there
any chance you could use a slightly more conventional layout style? I
find that function definitions laid out as

/*
* Find an empty region entry.
*/
static hwres_entry_t * find_empty
(
void
)
{
int i;
...
}

are a bit visually jarring, and they don't match any other part of the
kernel that I know of. Since I imagine many people may want to work on
the resource manager, it seems polite to stick to the standard coding
style.

phil


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:38    [W:0.527 / U:0.132 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site