[lkml]   [1996]   [Dec]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: PNP patch into kernel when?

    On Thu, 5 Dec 1996, Philip Blundell wrote:

    > IMHO, any symbol that gets exported to modules should be viewed as
    > 'external', and not changed without a very good reason. This applies
    > especially to global things like kmalloc and the request_*() functions.

    It is getting late in the Linux development cycle to change its
    interfaces. Unfortunately, Linux is still being developed and will
    perhaps continue to develop over time.

    Perhaps it should be considered splitting off a 2.2 kernel that
    conforms to the old standard, and a parallel 3.0 version with the
    resource management and other interface breaking code in it. Later
    development will occur on 3.0 as 3.1. This provides a kernel (2.2) that
    anyone can use and prepares everyone for 3.2.

    William Burrow -- Fredericton Area Network, New Brunswick, Canada
    Copyright 1996 William Burrow
    This line left intentionally blank.

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:38    [W:0.024 / U:7.840 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site