Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 4 Dec 1996 18:32:53 -0800 | From | David Dyck <> | Subject | Re: Which of the latest 2.0.x-versions is stable? None with NFS? |
| |
I've had not 'kernel' related problems and I'm runnint 2.0.27 and use NFS daily. I don't use amd.
Linux jd 2.0.27 #2 Sun Dec 1 21:33:53 PST 1996 i586
On Wed, 4 Dec 1996, Alan Cox wrote:
> Date: Wed, 4 Dec 1996 12:19:04 -0800 > From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> > To: dwmw2@cam.ac.uk > Cc: zie@lte.e-technik.uni-erlangen.de, linux-smp@vger.rutgers.edu, > linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu > Subject: Re: Which of the latest 2.0.x-versions is stable? None with NFS? > > > > So I think it's the NFS support in the kernel, not amd. I thought as much > > anyway - even if amd was completely screwed, it shouldn't bring the entire > > machine grinding to a halt if the kernel's sound. > > > > Is anyone looking into this problem? > > Make amd and the mount use a 1K block size then tell me if you can reproduce > the hang > >
| |