lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1996]   [Dec]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateTue, 31 Dec 96 23:42:28 EST
FromTom Dyas <>
Subjectquestion about modules rewrite
Now that the kernel modules implementation has been rewritten for the
better and the interface changed somewhat, is there any reason to have
both sys_create_module() and sys_init_module()?

Why isn't the functionality of sys_create_module() in
sys_init_module()? It might be better to move it because then you
could have sys_create_module() return ENOSYS. This would have the
effect of causing the older, unsupported module utilities to bail out
early.

Tom

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:38    [from the cache]
©2003-2008